Material Processing

Quarry Plant Solutions /Stone Crusher Plants
AS a leading global manufacturer of Stone Crusher equipment, we offer advanced, rational solutions for any size-reduction requirements, including quarry, aggregate, grinding production and complete stone crushing plant. We also supply individual crushers and mills as well as spare parts of them.

Supreme courts judgement on mechanised sand digging

  • Mining effect: Aravalli gets new lakes - Down to Earth

    May 22, 2013· Supreme Court judgment on mining in the Aravalli Hill Range of Haryana as on May 8, 2009. Supreme Court judgment on mining in the Aravalli hill range of Haryana as on 14 May, 2008. Supreme Court judgment on mining in the Aravalli hill range of Haryana as on 13 April, 2006. Supreme Court judgment on Aravalli hill of Haryana as on 19 April, 2002

  • Martin v Farrell Bldg. Co. Inc. - Justia Law

    supreme court of the state of new york county of new york: ias part 8 -----)( jonathan martin, plaintiff, -against-farrell building company inc., 195 georgia road llc, soil, inc., derosa land management, wainscott sand and gravel corp., rise & shine concrete corp., butch payne inc.,

  • Ross v. Acadian Seaplants, Ltd. :: 2019 :: Maine Supreme

    The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the judgment of the superior court granting summary judgment in favor of Property Owners in this property dispute, holding that rockweed, a species of seaweed that grows in Maine's intertidal zone, is private property that belongings to the adjoining upland landowner who owns the intertidal soil in fee simple and is therefore not public property.

  • State Land Bd. v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co. :: 429 U.S

    The judgment under review is vacated, and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Oregon for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. * Together with No. 75-577, Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co. v. Oregon ex rel. State Land Board, also on certiorari to the same court.

  • No. In The Supreme Court of the United States

    In Penn Central Transp. Co. v. N. Y., 438 U.S. 104 (1978), this Court held that Fifth Amendment regulatory takings claims are governed by three factors: the economic impact of the challenged

  • Parker v. Swan Creek Twp. Bd. of - Supreme Court of Ohio

    Feb 24, 2006· The court reversed the board's decision and directed it to issue appellees a conditional use permit. It is from that judgment that appellants appeal. {¶ 18} The standard of review to be applied by the common pleas court is set forth in R.C. 2506.04 and states: "The court may find that the order, adjudication, or decision

  • Summary and Analysis of James Madison's Federalist No. 51

    The members of the judiciary, such as judges of the Supreme Court, are to be appointed by the executive, rather than the public, keeping in mind their moral and educational qualifications. These members keep the legislative and judiciary in their proper place, as they solve disputes regarding distribution of power between the two departments.

  • Jenni Monet: Making the case for treaties at Mount Rushmore

    Jul 06, 2020· On the eve of the Gathering, the Supreme Court delivered an 81 decision that said the Lakota were entitled to compensation for the Black Hills, seized by Congress a century earlier by use of eminent domain. The ruling resulted in $105 million to be divided among eight different tribes of the Great Sioux Nation.

  • Ceaseless sand mining of the Narmada puts the river at risk

    Jan 20, 2017· In Barwani, legally-mined sand, often used in construction, can fetch up to Rs 700 a truckload of sand mined illegally, goes for Rs 2000-3000. With the ever-increasing demands of the construction industry and how difficult it is to navigate the bureaucratic red tape to mine sand legally, illegal sand mining is a lucrative business.

  • Supreme Court Declares Super Scoop a Vessel

    On February 22, 2005, the United States Supreme Court reversed the First Circuit Court of Appeals holding that the Super Scoop, a dredge used during the Boston Big Dig, qualified as a vessel for purposes of federal law.

  • Backgrounder: The legal fight against illegal sand mining

    Mar 21, 2015· While the issue of sand mining had been known earlier as well, it has gained significant legal prominence ever since the Supreme Court of India, in

  • Sand mining: NGT not to interfere with states rules

    Oct 05, 2018· It also noted the Supreme Courts judgement in the case of Deepak Kumar Vs State of Haryana (2012) clearly stated that no mining lease can be

  • Legal advice on Easements and land use law Page 1 - Avvo

    May 01, 2021· Years ago I became aware that one of the original AT&T 'long lines' - used for long distance telephony - was under my property. The easement protecting it was created in 1942 and attached to the first deed of sale in the 1950s after subdivision, but not any subsequent ones.

  • Digging Their Own Grave, One Breath at a Time

    Digging Their Own Grave, One Breath at a Time despite a Supreme Court order. On questioning one such owner, Aijaz, he said, The factory is fully mechanized and operates without human labour

  • STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL

    The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment, which the Court initially addressed in its May 5, 2005 decision. In re Appeal of Rueger, No. 122-7-04 Vtec, slip op. at 3-5 (Vt. Envtl. Ct. May 5, 2005)(Durkin, J.). The Court made two preliminary determinations: first, that Bylaws § 526 authorized the removal of sand and gravel for sale

  • The Exxon Valdez ruling: the Supreme Court once again

    Jul 02, 2008· On June 25, the next-to-last day of the current term, the United States Supreme Court slashed the punitive damages judgment for the 1989 Exxon

  • UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

    The defendants appealed, and while that a ppeal was pending, the Supreme Court decided Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), which addr essed the scope of the term waters of the United States in the Clean Water Act. The parties jointly moved for a limited remand from this Court so the district court could reconsider whether

  • Shipbreaking Judgment Is Timely Reminder Of Shipping

    Sep 21, 2020· In July 2020, a High Court judgment in Begum v Maran [2020] EWHC 1846 (QB) was handed down where, for the first time, an English court has grappled with the controversial issue of "shipbreaking".. Given recent shipping disasters in Beirut and Mauritius, the judgment is a timely reminder of the law relating to shipping companies' liability, even if the ship itself has changed hands.

  • Legal Reporter for the National Sea Grant College Program

    On February 22, 2005, the United States Supreme Court reversed the First Circuit Court of Appeals holding that theSuper Scoop, a dredge used during the Boston Big Dig, qualified as a vessel for purpos-es of federal law. Background As a part of Bostons Central Artery/Tunnel Project, also known as the Big Dig, the Super Scoopdug the

  • United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

    Feb 11, 2021· But the district court later granted summary judgment for All Coast. The court found that the cooks The Supreme Court has clarified that courts are to give FLSA exemptions a fair reading, as opposed to the narrow interpretation operations or in the digging or processing of sand, gravel, or other materials

  • Rudzik Excavating, Inc. v - Supreme Court of Ohio

    the judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, following a jury trial, awarding appellee, Rudzik Excavating, Inc., $525,210 in damages on Rudziks claim against the District for breach of contract. At issue is whether the trial court erred in denying the Districts motion for directed verdict. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

  • REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL

    individual builders are aggrieved by the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 8.10.2010, inter alia, holding that excavation activity even for the purposes of laying foundation of the building would still attract rigours of Section 48(7) of the Revenue Code. Under the aforesaid provision of the Code extraction of minerals by any person

  • Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp. - Justia US Supreme Court

    Accordingly. it reversed the trial court and entered judgment for respondent. Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp., 7 Ill.App.2d 307, 129 N.E.2d 454. The Illinois Supreme Court denied a petition for an appeal. We granted certiorari. 351 U.S. 949.

  • Digging for development: the hidden cost of sand :: IWMI

    May 19, 2014· The 2004 tsunami and the end of the civil war in 2009 precipitated a construction boom, which doubled the pre-tsunami annual demand for sand from 5 to 10 million cubic meters1. Despite Supreme Court intervention in 2004, which allowed artisanal mining only at specific locations, illegal mining continues.

  • Rudzik Excavating, Inc. v - Supreme Court of Ohio

    the judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, following a jury trial, awarding appellee, Rudzik Excavating, Inc., $525,210 in damages on Rudziks claim against the District for breach of contract. At issue is whether the trial court erred in denying the Districts motion for directed verdict. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

  • Backgrounder: The legal fight against illegal sand mining

    Mar 21, 2015· While the issue of sand mining had been known earlier as well, it has gained significant legal prominence ever since the Supreme Court of India, in

  • SC says no to royalty on excavated earth for laying

    Dec 05, 2014· The Supreme Court has held that the government is not entitled to any mining royalty if a developer excavates land for laying foundation of a building, thus

  • Enforcement & Monitoring Guidelines for Sand Mining

    lease. In order to comply with the judgment of Honble Supreme Court, the Ministry issued S.O.141 (E) dated 15.01.2016. Further, MoEF&CC published Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines 2016 for scientific and sustainable sand mining in the Country. The recommendations for the

  • SC Issues Notice On PIL To Make EIA Compulsory For All

    Jul 24, 2019· Although the Supreme Court had directed in 2012 in Deepak Kumar case that all mining projects, regardless of area, should have EC, the classification of sand

  • REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL

    transferred to this Court to be heard along with W.P. (C) No. 435 of 2012 filed by Goa Foundation. 9. All those petitions came to be decided by this Court by judgment and order dated 21.4.2014 [Goa Foundation vs. Union of India & Others1] (hereinafter referred to as Goa

  • University of Cape Town - OpenUCT Home

    Figure 4. Access road to a sand mining site on the lower Illovo River, KwaZulu-Natal. Figure 5. Front-end loader scooping up sand from the deposit at a sand mining site on the lower Illovo River, KwaZulu-Natal. Figure 6. Sand being loaded onto a truck at a sand mining site on the lower Illovo River, KwaZulu-Natal.

  • State Of Nct Of Delhi vs Sanjay on 4 September, 2014

    Sep 04, 2014· Criminal Appeal No.499 of 2011 arose out of an order passed by the Delhi High Court on an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the FIR registered at Police Station Alipur under Sections 379 / 114 / 120B / 34 IPC on the allegation that appellant was involved in illegal mining of sand from the Yamuna basin.

  • Why Is Illegal Sand Mining Harmful - Legal Service India

    In February 2012,the supreme court of India ruled that approval under the 2006 environment impact assessment (EIA) notification is needed for all the sand miners collection activity, even if the area being is less than 5 hectares.

  • Supreme Court Rules a Dredge Is a Jones Act Vessel

    In an 8-0 decision 1, which may have sweeping implications for seamen, longshore workers, their employers, and not least of all their insurers, the Supreme Court held that 1 U.S.C. § 3 provides the dispositive definition of a "vessel" for the purposes of determining whether a watercraft is a "vessel" within the purview of the Jones Act and the Longshore Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA).

  • IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

    The court granted EMCs motion for summary judgment and denied West Libertys motion. The district court found that the only event that caused damages was the electrical arc, noting the squirrel did no damage to West Libertys property such as gnawing on a power line or digging for nuts in a dangerous area. The court held,

  • Supreme Court Considers Fourth Amendment Exception Let

    Mar 27, 2021· Should the Supreme Court adopt the Biden Administrations argument that the Fourth Amendment permits a warrantless seizure or home entry that is reasonably necessary to protect health or safety, such public health and safety concerns could become a pretext for law enforcement, argued Shay Dvoretzky, who argued for Caniglia before

  • Supreme Court Rules a Dredge Is a Jones Act Vessel

    Supreme Court Rules a Dredge Is a Jones Act Vessel On February 22, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited ruling in Stewart v Dutra Construction Company, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 1397; 2005 WL 405475 (U.S.).

  • Enforcement & Monitoring Guidelines for Sand Mining

    In order to comply with the judgment of Honble Supreme Court, the Ministry issued S.O.141 (E) dated 15.01.2016. Further, MoEF&CC published Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines 2016 for scientific and sustainable sand mining in the Country.

  • HOLDEN v. HARDY, Sheriff. Supreme Court US Law LII

    The supreme court denied his application, and remanded him to the custody of the sheriff, whereupon he sued out this writ of error, assigning the unconstitutionality of the law. In the second case the complaint alleged the unlawful employment by Holden of one William Hooley to work and labor in a certain concentrating millthe same being an

  • Removal of Sand and Gravel Act Seychelles Legal

    Jun 30, 2012· (a) includes abstraction and removal of sand or gravel from any place, including the public domain; (b) applies even if the person owns the property; and (c) includes the digging or stacking of sand or gravel for the purpose of removal. 4. (1) The Minister may give to the Controller of Sand and Gravel directions of a general character, not

  • Now, fencing at shifting sand dune area to be mechanised

    Dec 18, 2017· Up Next. Now, fencing at shifting sand dune area to be mechanised; NHAI to expedite work of increasing lanes; Starting 2021 in style! Meet the all-new OPPO Reno5 Pro 5G

  • U.S. Supreme Court Muddies the Waters on Isolated Wetlands

    the District Court granted the COEs motion for summary judgment and , on appeal, the Seventh Circuit held that the Congress had authority under the Commerce Clause to regulate intrastate waters and that the migratory rule was a reasonable interpretation of the CWA. The Supreme Court

  • SC Issues Notice On PIL To Make EIA Compulsory For All

    Jul 24, 2019· The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice to Centre in a Public Interest Litigation which seeks a direction that Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), Environmental Management Plan

  • law - Was the secession of the Confederate states illegal

    The United States Supreme Court ruled unilateral secession unconstitutional while commenting that revolution or consent of the states could lead to a successful secession. NOTE: The Supreme Court ruling was after the Civil War. Legality: The principle of legality is the legal ideal that requires all law to be clear, ascertainable and non-retrospective. . It requires decision makers to resolve


Copyright © 2021 Meilan International Jaw crusher / Cone crusher / Contact Us